Welcome to Singulati: Our Singularity Weblog Forum
Singulati is a free digital forum open to both singularitarians and skeptics who come together to discuss, debate, collaborate, learn and network within a friendly, informal and rewarding atmosphere. Join us today: together we can build a better future, better you!A A A
Please consider registering
Alright, so suppose you replaced both your legs and arms with robotic limbs that were superior in every way; would you have to radically alter your diet? The way I see it, unless you specifically designed the limbs to process the energy that the body produces through digesting food, then you would have to drastically cut down on the amount of food taken, as there would be much less "meat" for it to power. Am I wrong in thinking this?...
Sounds right to me. I suppose it depends upon how heavy limbs were because you would have to also account for the displacement in weight between biological legs and mechanical ones. Caloric requirement can be roughly estimated by weight (although to a good extent depends upon how much of that weight is muscle vs. fat).
So we can do a rough calculation to figure this out.
A male weighing 140 pounds at 5'5 who is moderately active requires roughly 2300 calories a day. http://walking.about.com/cs/ca.....alcalc.htm
If you assume that each leg weights 15 pounds, but that the mechanical legs weigh exactly the same, then you would calculate caloric requirements for a male at 110, in which case caloric requirements fall to approximately 2000 a day.
However, if the mechanical legs weighted less or more, then more or less calories would be needed in direct proportion to how active a person is. If the person never leaves bed then the caloric requirements are still 2000. If they are very active they will need slightly more, just like you need more energy to walk around with ankle weights.
If the mechanical legs were somehow powered by electricity then I suppose you would end up in a situation where the person with them would have the caloric requirements of someone of the same biological weight who didn't move very much.
Overall, though, it seems there wouldn't be that much of a difference. Probably appetite would decrease but who knows because the body does mysterious phantom limb things.
-Nikki [Image Can Not Be Found]
Most Users Ever Online: 70
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 56
Newest Members:Marek Rosa, Mark Kincheloe, Mythago, rxrus, Andrea Whitmer, juancarlos
Administrators: Socrates: 123, zippykid: 7, davidaj: 0