Michio Kaku on the Collapse of Moore’s Law

Socrates / , ,

Posted on: May 1, 2012 / Last Modified: May 1, 2012

Moore’s Law has been around since 1965 when Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore described it in a paper. Since that day, the law has been in full effect, and the number of transistors placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit has roughly doubled every two years. It’s also a commonly held belief that chip performance doubles every 18 months.

But Moore’s Law won’t be true forever, and in the video below theoretical physicist Michio Kaku explains how it will collapse. And Kaku argues that the collapse isn’t going to happen in some distant future but within the next decade.

The problem is one of finding a replacement for silicon coupled with the exponential nature of Moore’s Law. Quite simply, computing power cannot go on doubling every two years indefinitely.

The other issue is we are about to reach the limits of silicon. According to Kaku, once we get done to 5nm processes for chip production, silicon is finished. Any smaller and processors will just overheat.

What’s beyond silicon? There have been a number of proposals: protein computers, DNA computers, optical computers, quantum computers, molecular computers. Dr. Michio Kaku says “if I were to put money on the table I would say that in the next ten years as Moore’s Law slows down, we will tweak it.”

So, what do you think?

Is Michio Kaku right or is he going to be just one among many who wrongly predicted the demise of Moore’s Law?!

Browse More

A cracked vintage crystal ball beside a polished antique mirror reflecting a modern city skyline at golden hour, illustrating why a futurist keynote speaker should reflect reality rather than predict the future.

Futurists Don’t Have Crystal Balls. They Have Mirrors

Contemplative figure overlooking a luminous network of human silhouettes, illustrating AI and human agency

Technological Power and the Evolution of Interior Life: A reflection on artificial intelligence, human agency, and the future of progress

Vintage brass binoculars resting on an empty executive leather chair facing a city skyline at golden hour, symbolizing leadership absent from thinking about the future.

The Futurist Red Flag: When Leadership Outsources Thinking About the Future

hammer-of-ai-butterfly-among-nails-preview

The Hammer of AI: When Every Problem Looks Like a Nail

A solitary Japanese Kyudo archer at full draw, silhouetted against a setting sun over distant mountains.

There Is No Formula: Why AI Cannot Solve What Matters Most

Archery target with six arrows clustered tightly off-center, missing the painted bullseye. Visual metaphor for Goodhart's Law in AI: the system optimized perfectly for the wrong target.

The Why Is a Discipline: Why a Good Why Is Also Not Enough

A two-faced Janus marble bust on a museum plinth, one face classical stone, the other etched with faint glowing circuit traces, illustrating the dual nature of AI as cure or poison.

The AI Paradox: Cure or Poison?

Dune Part Three official title card — Dune Messiah meaning explained

Dune Is Not What You Think: The Warning Frank Herbert Meant Us to Hear