Nikola Danaylov on Ex Human: the Lessons of 2020

Nikola Danaylov / , ,

Posted on: December 27, 2020 / Last Modified: December 27, 2020

I want to help out new podcasters as much as I can. So, when they ask me for an interview, I’m almost always looking for a reason to say “Yes.” Here is my 2nd interview for Alexander Padalka’s Ex Human on the lessons of 2020. I hope you find it is worth your time.

During this 40 min conversation, we cover a variety of topics such as:  what made 2020 so special; why we should all be grateful for what we have; how our stories skew our views of the evidence; self-driving cars and the definition thereof; space exploration and establishing permanent bases on the Moon and Mars; Hugo Dreyfus’ 1st Step Fallacy and AI; violence, human nature, love, and hate; focusing on what we can, instead of what we can’t change;  the practice and process of not giving up; a suggested book-reading list for 2021; why we should ask not for fewer challenges but for a stronger character.

Browse More

Ray Kurzweil's "Six Epochs of Evolution" diagram from The Singularity Is Near, showing six linked circles ascending to Epoch 6, "The Universe Wakes Up."

NOT Logic, BIOLogic: Why the AI Revolution Will Birth a Neo-Romanticism

A cracked vintage crystal ball beside a polished antique mirror reflecting a modern city skyline at golden hour, illustrating why a futurist keynote speaker should reflect reality rather than predict the future.

Futurists Don’t Have Crystal Balls. They Have Mirrors

Contemplative figure overlooking a luminous network of human silhouettes, illustrating AI and human agency

Technological Power and the Evolution of Interior Life: A reflection on artificial intelligence, human agency, and the future of progress

Vintage brass binoculars resting on an empty executive leather chair facing a city skyline at golden hour, symbolizing leadership absent from thinking about the future.

The Futurist Red Flag: When Leadership Outsources Thinking About the Future

hammer-of-ai-butterfly-among-nails-preview

The Hammer of AI: When Every Problem Looks Like a Nail

A solitary Japanese Kyudo archer at full draw, silhouetted against a setting sun over distant mountains.

There Is No Formula: Why AI Cannot Solve What Matters Most

Archery target with six arrows clustered tightly off-center, missing the painted bullseye. Visual metaphor for Goodhart's Law in AI: the system optimized perfectly for the wrong target.

The Why Is a Discipline: Why a Good Why Is Also Not Enough

A two-faced Janus marble bust on a museum plinth, one face classical stone, the other etched with faint glowing circuit traces, illustrating the dual nature of AI as cure or poison.

The AI Paradox: Cure or Poison?