Quantcast
≡ Menu

Knowledge Is Power, Code Is King, and Orwell Was Right

Editor’s Note: This is a short excerpt from Future Crimes – the scariest book I have ever read:

Future Crimes book jacket imageIn George  Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, he depicted an omnipotent government surveillance state controlled  by a privileged few elite who persecuted independent thinking as “thought crimes.” Though Orwell clearly would have foreseen the NSA debacle, it’s less clear he might have predicted Acxiom, Facebook, and Google. To that point, in those cases it wasn’t Big Brother government that “did something to us,” but rather we who did something to ourselves. We allowed ourselves to become monetized and productized on the cheap, giving away billions of dollars of our personal data to new classes of elite who saw an opportunity and seized it. We accepted all their one-sided Terms of Service [ToS] without ever reading them, and they maximized their profits, unencumbered by regulation or oversight. To be sure, we got some pretty cool products out of the deal, and Angry Birds is really fun. But now that we’ve given all these data away, we find ourselves at the mercy of powerful data behemoths with near-government-level power who do as they please with our information and our lives.

In his 1999 book Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, the Harvard  Law School professor Lawrence Lessig insightfully demonstrated that the instructions encoded in any software  program, app, or platform shape and constrain the Internet, just as laws and regulations do. Thus, when Facebook or Google unilaterally changes its terms of service to allow your news feeds to become public or your photographs to be used in advertisements against your will, it is as if a new “law” has been passed. Code, is in effect, law.

Perhaps then the only way to opt out of such a system would be to close one’s account or never create one in the first place? Unfortunately, both approaches are problematic and increasingly impossible. A New York Times article previously noted that Facebook keeps all your data even after you’ve closed your account. Even if you chose not to participate in an online social network,  your friends would continue to tag you in pictures, the GPS in your car would still track your location, and Target would track all of your purchases.

The unprecedented volumes of data about ourselves that we have entrusted to private companies are up for grabs, and once the genie is out of the bottle, there’s no putting it back in. The troika of opportunity created by our online data exhaust, ridiculous terms of service, and little or no regulation means that modern data brokers can surveil us with better-than- government-grade surveillance capabilities, capturing  our every thought, photograph, and location  and subjecting  them  to big-data  analytics. As Mat Honan,  Bilal Ahmed, Mike Seay, Bobbi Duncan,  Leigh  Van Bryan, and Emily Bunting  all learned  firsthand,  there are social costs and risks associated with our continued data leakage. But privacy implications are just one of the great threats resulting from the exponential growth in data.

Hackers are hard at work stealing all of the social data you have dutifully reported on yourself and are successfully breaking into the computers of data brokers and Internet giants responsible  for storing it all. As Sony, Target, and even the Department of Defense have learned, data stored in insecure information systems are data waiting to be taken. As such, all data gathered will eventually leak, with potent  implications  for our personal and professional lives and even for our safety and security.

The problem with our being the product as opposed to the customer of massive data brokers is that we are not in control of our data and thus not in control of our destiny. The continued aggregation of this information, unregulated and insecure, sits as a ticking time bomb, with our every thought and deed available for the picking by a new and emerging  class of bad actors whose intents  are far worse than selling us discounted diapers and adjusting our insurance rates. International organized  crime groups, rogue governments, and even terrorists  are rapidly establishing their own data brokerages and bolstering their analytic capabilities in order to take full advantage of the single largest bonanza that has ever come their way, with frightening  implications for us all.

Excerpted from Future Crimes: Everything Is Connected, Everyone Is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It.  Copyright © 2015 Marc Goodman.  Published by Doubleday Canada, a division of Random House of Canada Limited a Penguin Random House Company. Reproduced by arrangement with the Publisher. All rights reserved.

 

About the Author:

Marc Goodman author photoMarc Goodman has spent a career in law enforcement and technology. He was appointed as futurist-in-residence with the FBI, worked as a senior adviser to Interpol, and served as a street police officer. As the founder of the Future Crimes Institute and the Chair for Policy, Law, and Ethics at Silicon Valley’s Singularity University, he continues to investigate the intriguing and often terrifying intersection of science and security, uncovering nascent threats and combating the darker sides of technology.

Future Crimes Book Trailer:

The Future of Crime:

Marc Goodman, Policy, Law and Ethics Chair at Singularity University, shares examples of the ways technology is transforming security and privacy.

 

Like this article?

Please help me produce more content:

Donate!

OR

Please subscribe for free weekly updates:

  • CM Stewart

    So are we doooomed?? Will I be plunged into existential despair if I read this book? I’m already teetering on the edge…

  • No Cynthia, we are not all doomed. And Marc has a good section on “what to do about it” But we have to recognize the problem before we even get to addressing it. And realize that we have our work cut out for us.

  • CM Stewart

    Thanks for your thoughtful reply, Nikola, and I look forward to your interview of Goodman. You have a gift for presenting optimism as a reasonable mindset. 🙂

  • As a internet and multimedia marketing guy – I do feel it necessary to point out that this link is being circulated with lots of data-mining things itself…and I’m pretty sure that the fear-inspiring book trailer helps create buzz, which in turn sells more books.

    I’d be curious to read a full disclosure statement about how much money is being spent to promote this book.

    🙂

  • I am afraid I am missing your second point entirely and I am not quite sure what you are referring to in your first point: 2. What does spending money to promote the book have to do with anything?! If you are saying the article above is product placement then I can only say that it is not – I am not getting paid to publish this or any other article. I read the book, got pretty scared while I loved it, not to mention Marc is an old friend and the piece above stands great on its own. So that is why I published it. 1. What exactly do you mean by the data-mining on “this link”? Which link? If you are referring to the URL of my blog then I do use Google Analytics and Quantcast to be able to quantify my traffic etc but that’s about it. What in the world are you referring to?!

  • Pingback: Singularity 1on1: Marc Goodman on Future Crimes()

Over 3,000 super smart people have subscribed to my newsletter: