• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
singularityweblog-create-the-future-logo-thumb
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact

H+

The Great H+ Hoax

September 7, 2012 by Socrates

I recently run a bit of a social experiment on Singularity Weblog: I wrote two articles which had almost identical titles with the only difference being that one was positive and one was negative. So far the negative article has had over four times more traffic and attention than the positive one.

This outcome is no revelation. It is a well documented fact about one of our most powerful cognitive biases.

Fear seems to be a much stronger motivation than hope. Just like pain seems to be better motivation than pleasure.

So, can we blame the media of exploiting this prehistoric hard-wired bias of ours?!

After all, the media didn’t create the principle that “If it bleeds, it leads and reads.” They just observed what was already out there and began exploiting it to get our attention and, ultimately, make a buck.

The new H+ Digital Series is no different.

Just another unoriginal doom, gloom and “the sky is falling” apocalyptic mini-series.

And why not?! Fear spreads faster than positive thinking. It is easier to write Frankenstein than Abundance.

Why take the hard way?!

Why not paint the darkest, most scary and apocalyptic picture and cash out on a beautiful day like today?!

Throw in some good acting, tons of special FX, a decent sondtrack and you might end up with a blockbuster. But, other than a brief moment of attention and a few silver coins there is really not much there there. As Cory Doctorow notes in Why Science Fiction Movies Drive Me Nuts: “What they lack in depth and introspection, they make up for in polish and craftsmanship.”

The problem is that this kind of attitude, while individually profitable in the short-term, is collectively very damaging in the long term. And it doesn’t have to be like that.

A good sci fi movie costs as much as a bad one. (Anything from almost nothing to infinity.) But it has to dare stand for something other than popcorn. Something that you can’t fake even with all the special FX money can buy. Something positive and original that goes beyond merely spitting over an idea such as transhumanism. Something that brings new and positive contribution to the field rather than regurgitating all the doom and gloom since Frankenstein…

Calling transhumanism the world’s most dangerous idea can be damaging. But doing so without any critical discourse, public debate or alternative points of view, is outright dangerous. It results in popular suspicion, even outright hostility to anything science and you end up with a society of dead, dusty ideas with a great past but no future. So if in the end it turns out that the future really doesn’t need us it would be a future of our own making; a direct result of the choices we make, the actions we take and yes, even the movies we produce and watch today.

The future can be better than we think. But before we can make it happen we must think and believe it. It’s been thousands of years since the first time someone cried “the end is nigh.” Yet we have survived and prospered. It is time to recognize the cry for nothing but a hoax. And the person shouting – nothing but a cheap snake-oil salesman.

H+: The Digital Series

Synopsis: In the future, 33% of the human population will retire their cell phones and laptops in favor of a new technology which connects the human nervous system to the internet. But something dark is coming to threaten this path of accelerating progress…

Episode 1: Driving Under

San Francisco, USA – 5 minutes before it happened

Prologue: Fragments of news reports show a future world as it adopts H+: a radical new way to be connected to information and each other through only your thoughts, via a high-tech implant. While the breakthrough is hotly anticipated by the masses, it is a change not easily adopted by its discontents. We segue to a couple parking their car in an underground airport garage. The husband, Lee, surreptitiously watches a football game on his H+, upsetting his wife Julie who wants him to drive safely. Their domestic squabble is interrupted by a bizarre spectacle throwing their world into chaos

Episode 2: On Their Level

San Francisco, USA – 15 seconds after it happened

Julie and Lee stand shocked at the sudden chaos surrounding them in the lot and then risk a similar fate as Lee goes to aid the fallen people. A mysterious bearded man in glasses, Kenneth, appears and leads a small group down to Level 6, where he insists they’re safe. But some in the group are skeptical of their hero and his theory for what has just happened.

Episode 3: Prophetess 

Helsinki, Finland – 7 years before it happened

A young man, Topi, enters a bar to meet a woman named Manta, who he has chatted with online. Manta plays mysterious, giving Topi a hard time, but Topi may have secrets of his own.

Episode 4: Airport Security 

San Francisco, USA – 1 minute after it happened

With a small group from Level 6 of the parking structure, Kenneth takes Lee’s body to a van to get out of the water from the sprinkler system with the hope he may be able to save him.

Episode 5: A Large Family 

Mumbai, India – 5 months before it happened

Breanna, a hard-charging technology executive, and her husband Connal (both Irish) meet with a doctor, Gurveer, and a young woman, Leena (both Indian), to arrange a surrogate pregnancy. When the introductory meeting turns into something more like an interrogation and Breanna leaves to continue a work call on her H+, Connall tries to make a more human connection.

Episode 6: Voci Dal Sud

Oria, Italy – 2 years after it happened

In a desolate village, Matteo tries to help a man injured in an accident, but realizes getting the medicine he needs will not be easy.

Episode 7: Implanted 

Mumbai, India – 5 months before it happened

Gurveer prepares to implant H+ in Leena so the Sheehans can track her pregnancy from abroad; she’s anxious and asks many questions about the process. Gurveer, who tells her his own body is not compatible with H+, tells her she is lucky…though something else is commanding his attention.

Episode 8: Makeshift Engineering 

San Francisco, USA – 45 minutes after it happened

Kenneth races to save Lee’s life with spare wiring and circuit boards. Francesca, a soon to be a board-certified neurologist, objects to Kenneth’s methods and can’t believe what she’s seeing.

Episode 9: The Snow Viper 

Helsinki, Finland – 7 years before it happened

Topi, now in a physical relationship with Manta, goes to a crime scene which is technically out of his office’s jurisdiction. His boss holds him back, but a look at the victim offers a tantalizing clue.

Episode 10: Out 

San Francisco, USA – 50 minutes after it happened

Kenneth tells the small group to plan for a week below, and tries to stop an angry survivor from leaving, only to be accused of being a terrorist. Just as he needs good news, he’s pulled away to examine Lee whose condition has changed.

Episode 11: Manta 

Helsinki, Finland – 7 years before it happened

Topi and Manta hike, sharing a growing intimacy – but Manta won’t reveal anything about a particular subject.

Episode 12: Searching Over 

San Francisco, USA – 20 hours after it happened

In a quiet moment, Francesca asks to get the truth out of Kenneth. How does he know so much about H+? Meanwhile, a group of survivors searches for Kenneth.

Episode 13: Questions 

Porland, Oregon, USA – 5 years before it happened

Breanna, after pitching her new software venture to a corporate boardroom, later privately meets with a younger, clean-shaven Kenneth to offer an opportunity.

Episode 14: The Gates

San Vito, Italy – 2 years after it happened

Someone with an interface observes Matteo outside the gates of a base. Later, Matteo returns home and has a flash of insight.

Related articles
  • Cory Doctorow: Why SF movies make me insane (boingboing.net)

Filed Under: Op Ed, Video, What if? Tagged With: H+, transhumanism

Do We Need to Have a “Future Day”?

September 28, 2011 by wpengine

“In thinking about how to get people interested in and excited about Transhumanist ideas explicitly, one idea I thought about was to create a holiday for the future. You think about all these holidays we have they are all about past events, but what if there were a holiday specifically oriented towards future events. So you could have many of them, you could have a ‘Singularity Day’, an ‘Artilect War Day’ for the future war, or simply a ‘Future Day’, to try and bring people together around the idea of creating a better future”

The remarks above were made by Ben Goertzel during the question and answer period of last week’s H+ Leadership Summit (see the full video at the end of the article), a discussion held in virtual world Second Life on leadership and the realization of Transhumanist goals. Author and polymath Howard Bloom, who positively influenced the musical careers of Michael Jackson, Prince, John Cougar Mellencamp, Kiss, Queen, Bette Midler, Billy Joel, Diana Ross, Simon & Garfunkel, and many others, responded enthusiastically to Goertzel’s suggestion, calling the idea ‘fabulous’, and stating that in addition to being a source of excitement and means to raise awareness regarding Transhumanist ideas, an event of this nature could have broad reaching societal affect, potentially altering the prevailing mood of the time by turning over a new leaf of optimism. Bloom argues that in periods of economic collapse “we lose our sense of a future,” and “the thing that pulls us out of the trenches, and back up onto the landscape and charging toward the future is someone’s willingness to give us a vision of the future”. During the 1930s, the vision serving this function was the vision to electrify every home – which at the time, he points out, seemed “absolutely absurd.” And having a vision, in and of itself, can have a leveraging effect, he says, as a vision of the future “pulls us into the future.”

When it comes to optimism and moving forward, the Transhumanist outlook has a great deal to offer. Before us we see perpetual and accelerating progress, important breakthroughs occurring regularly, with radical predictions being met and exceeded, and knowledge exploding. And the Transhumanist vision more broadly is one of innovation and pushing beyond boundaries. But, as Bloom and others point out, in the interest of reaching as many people as possible, it’s best the holiday not be specifically Transhumanist, and instead be something more general so that everyone could readily understand and easily connect with. Natasha Vita-More adds that it should be something “beyond religion, beyond politics, and has the vision of expanding our horizons.”

The success of related events, such as Yuri’s Night:A World Space Party, an event celebrated annually in now more than 30 countries, indicates viability in the ‘Future Day’ idea. Yuri’s Night, in addition to honoring Yuri Garagin – the first human in space, who flew the Vostok 1 spaceship on April 12, 1961, is meant to inspire interest in space exploration, and more generally, science. I attended the event this year in Edmonton Alberta, held at the Edmonton Space and Science Center, and found it did just that. But ‘Future Day’ could be much more expansive. Natasha Vita-More and others identify other successful future oriented events in the past, such as the ‘World’s Fair’ (which this year was held only in China) and Bruce Mau’s ‘Massive Change’ initiative, as examples of events with similar magnitude and/or spirit to what a ‘Future Day’ could strive to become. Bloom remarks “we need people to apply their minds to the future the way they applied their minds to the World’s Fairs in the past”, where projects just kept get “bigger, and bigger, and bigger.”

Holidays have many positive social functions. For one, they create connections across entire societies, and sometimes internationally. In celebrating, people develop parallel experiences, and forge subtle bonds. ‘Future Day’, then, could offer people a means to relate to one another regarding the future.  And as Goertzel points out, a holiday celebrating the future could serve to unify diverse groups already oriented around future building, by “giving them something to contribute to without making them feel as though it was diluting their mission.”

Holidays are traditionally backward looking in nature, and a means of cultural preservation rather than evolution. ‘Future Day’ could have the opposite effect, making people more enthusiastic about change, and offering a vision that makes us more inclined to reach toward the future, and less afraid to let go of past ideas that may be interfering with progress.

So what features might a holiday for the future have?

Festivals: Cutting edge technology exhibits, musical events, fanfare. I can imagine more digital versions of colorful international festivals like the Holi festival and future oriented large-scale art installations the scale of Burning Man.

Activities for Kids: A great way to introduce kids to Transhumanist ideas. Could include school projects in the way kids do Christmas projects – plays about the future, crafts about the future etc.

Parades: A good way to get corporate sponsorship, and a good way to get media attention. Another great way to get kids interested in futurist ideas.

Parties: All kinds of parties. Wild parties celebrating future social liberation, cognitive enhancement parties, costume parties, dress like your avatar parties.

Celebrity Endorsement: Leonardo DiCaprio endorsed official secular holiday Earth Day in year 2000, and celebrities endorse social causes all the time. Future Day could also have cutting edge, provocative appeal that would motivate celebrities to associate themselves with the event.

Peaceful Protests: My guess is that as more people become excited about the future and want to see certain technologies developed sooner rather than later, more will come to feel there are unnecessary obstacles standing in the way of future tech. To date there is not much activism going on related directly to achieving Transhumanist goals, although some have taken matters into their own hands, in the form of Singularity political letter writing. Using ‘Earth Day’ as an example – holidays offer an opportunity to raise awareness regarding political and social issues. There are many humanitarian aspects of Transhumanism worth campaigning for, and this could be one way in which university students are involved in ‘Future Day’.

The Second Life conversation on ‘Future Day’ concluded with agreement that the idea should be pursued, and that refining the vision and working out the details would occur between H+ board members over the next couple weeks. Board members also discussed the benefits such an event would have for Transhumanism more specifically, such as shifting the focus from risks and ethics to something with more vision and more ‘fun’, and creating a vehicle and franchise in which to deliver Transhumanist ideas to the public. It will be exciting to see what they come up with, and watch the idea evolve as others become involved in the planning.

About the Author:

Nikki Olson is a writer/researcher working on an upcoming book about the Singularity with Dr. Kim Solez, as well as relevant educational material for the Lifeboat Foundation. She has a background in philosophy and sociology, and has been involved extensively in Singularity research for 3 years. You can reach Nikki via email at [email protected].

Humanity+ community event in Second Life, September 15, 2011

[youtube]https://youtu.be/6TW6FnvUFcE[/youtube]

Related articles
  • Visual Culture and Transhumanism
  • What Does it Mean to be a Transhumanist?

Filed Under: Op Ed, What if? Tagged With: Ben Goertzel, Future Day, H+, Natasha Vita-More, transhumanism

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Staying Sane in an Insane World
  • IASEAI’25 vs. The AI Action Summit: Will AI Be Driven by Cooperation or Competition?
  • “Conversations with the Future” Epilogue: Events Can Create the Future
  • Donald J. Robertson on How to Think Like Socrates in the Age of AI
  • Dr. Jad Tarifi of Integral AI: “We Now Have All the Ingredients for AGI”

Categories

  • Articles
  • Best Of
  • Featured
  • Featured Podcasts
  • Funny
  • News
  • Op Ed
  • Podcasts
  • Profiles
  • Reviews
  • ReWriting the Human Story
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • What if?

Join SingularityWeblog

Over 4,000 super smart people have subscribed to my newsletter in order to:

Discover the Trends

See the full spectrum of dangers and opportunities in a future of endless possibilities.

Discover the Tools

Locate the tools and resources you need to create a better future, a better business, and a better you.

Discover the People

Identify the major change agents creating the future. Hear their dreams and their fears.

Discover Yourself

Get inspired. Give birth to your best ideas. Create the future. Live long and prosper.

singularity-logo-2

Sign up for my weekly newsletter.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
You must accept the Terms and Conditions.
Get Started!

Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
  • Home
  • About
  • Start
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Media
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Ethos: “Technology is the How, not the Why or What. So you can have the best possible How but if you mess up your Why or What you will do more damage than good. That is why technology is not enough.” Nikola Danaylov

Copyright © 2009-2025 Singularity Weblog. All Rights Reserved | Terms | Disclosure | Privacy Policy