• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
singularityweblog-create-the-future-logo-thumb
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact

Kieran Griffith

This Article Was Written By A Robot

November 27, 2010 by wpengine

There is no one definition of robot which satisfies everyone and most people have their own. For example Joseph Engelberger, a pioneer in industrial robotics, once remarked: “I can’t define a robot, but I know one when I see one.”

According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica a robot is “any automatically operated machine that replaces human effort, though it may not resemble human beings in appearance or perform functions in a humanlike manner.” The Merriam-Webster dictionary describes a robot as a “machine that looks like a human being and performs various complex acts (as walking or talking) of a human being,” or a “device that automatically performs complicated often repetitive tasks,” or a “mechanism guided by automatic controls.”

ASIMO

A lot of people find it disturbing that humans are becoming more like robots while, at the same time, robots are also becoming more like humans. Many are philosophizing about what humans will become after we modify ourselves through genetic engineering or by implanting AI components into all parts of the body to improve our physical and mental abilities. There are concerns that such modifications will pervert us in some way and should perhaps be avoided. This is causing a lot of anxiety and some are warning that humans will stop being actually human.

I, for one, fail to see what the fuss is all about. There is a simple answer as to why the prospect of “artificial” human modification should not be a significant cause for concern.

Humans already are robots. One of my favorite quotes by Aubrey de Grey is “the human body is a very complex machine.” Yes, we are complex, self replicating and self-repairing, but we are machines never-the-less. Look at yourself, look at your hands – they are a small part of an extremely complex apparatus that is able to accomplish all kinds of sophisticated actions. Vertebrate life forms are the most complex apparatus ever developed and no definition of a robot says that it has to be man made. So what if the current life forms were created by the trial-and-error process called evolution for over 4.7 billion years?!…

It is a given that a person does look like a human and can replace other humans’ efforts and is able to perform various complex and often repetitive acts (such as walking and talking) and finally is guided by automatic controls (in our nervous system).

The human being is definitely not a perfect contraption for any mechanism can always be improved. However, the natural process of evolution that has updated humans until the start of the industrial revolution is no longer an option. Civilization needs to find a new way to improve their design. And just as humanity is transcending evolution the technology to modify the human machine will become available.

Original Ford Model T

The technology to maintain the human machine indefinitely in roughly its built condition will be fully available with the advent of regenerative medicine, as being developed by Aubrey de Grey and the SENS Foundation. In may take 20 or 30 years (or more) but the technological singularity (also estimated to take roughly another 20 or 30 years) will provide us with another way to improve the hardware we run on and build the next generation of humachines to be better then they would be by (evolutionary) chance.

Think of your body as an old car — you can keep it running in perfect condition indefinitely, for as long as you do the proper maintenance (i.e. regenerative medicine). Just like people who have an antique and perfectly working Ford Model T. Or you might want to put in a more powerful engine, an automatic gearbox and an air conditioning unit, so you can drive faster and more more comfortably. You can even turn it into a hot-rod muscle car for street racing or to impress the girls…

Ford Model T Hot Rod

Why would anyone worry about the option of modifying a robot to be a better robot?

Humans are always updating the programming of our biological CPU (through education) from the moment we are born. You are updating your programming even now – by reading this article. Further “artificial” mental and physical modifications that will be an option after the singularity will just be another hardware adjustment, not very much different from the one above. Some people want to keep their cars as if they just came off the assembly line. Others may let them wear out and go on to the scrap yard. But in my opinion, most will want to install parts that allow for better durability, performance, speed and comfort.

…I can now say that I know a robot when I see one. And that includes when I am looking at the mirror.

About the Author: Kieran Griffith is a voluntary consultant to the SENS Foundation for developing medical techniques that extend lifespan indefinitely. He has degrees in psychology, the Humanities and Space Science, and is planning a future career in the field of commercial spaceflight.

Related articles
  • Funny Or Serious: Are We Giving Robots Too Much Power? (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)
  • Can Terraforming Venus Be The Solution To Population Growth? (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)
  • Top 3 Robot Music Videos (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)

Filed Under: Op Ed, What if? Tagged With: Kieran Griffith, robot, singularity

Regenerative Medicine And Gambling: Is Longer Life Of Greater Value?

November 24, 2010 by wpengine

A funny thing happened to me when I first heard of the SENS Foundation and their program to develop strategies that will make it possible to live indefinitely.

The day before, if you had asked me to take a free ride on NASA’s Space Shuttle I would have accepted with elation. But when I fully realized that I might live a thousand years (provided that I don’t die in an accident) I realized I would only want to go on a Russian Soyuz Spacecraft, which is far safer and has not had a fatal accident in 39 years. The Shuttle is reusable but its R & D budget was cut in half by President Nixon, so the final design did not get an emergency escape system. Given that there is a strong probability that I may live longer than originally anticipated, I feel my life is worth more now. Thus I am not willing to risk it as much as I used to because I have more to lose.

Does knowing that I could live much longer turn me into a coward?

The life of a child is, I think, widely assumed to be worth more than the life of an adult, and I presume this is at least partially because a child has a longer future to look forward to…

The Challenger Explosion

Well, to be honest I don’t really feel like a coward, but, for sure, I have become more responsible, since I now am of the opinion that my life is worth more.

Recklessness is defined as “a disregard for or indifference to the dangers of a situation or for the consequences of one’s actions.” Now I ask myself the question: Why have I become less reckless? Well, if you are making a decision to gamble in any situation the odds are not the only factor but also the amount that you are willing to bet on those odds. You would not be too worried to bet seven dollars to buy a lottery ticket to win a million dollars, but you would be less inclined to buy a lottery ticket worth 70 dollars to win a million dollars without the more expensive ticket having better odds then the 7 dollar ticket. If I go to space I would be gambling on the possibility that my life might be in danger with odds of 1/17 because so far historically one in seventeen astronauts have died on the job. This also makes me realize that, at least in my case, my life is now worth more, since I know it will likely be much longer than I originally thought.

If the thought that I would live longer is now making me more risk-averse, will this be also the case with a significant percentage of the population? Does it imply that when regenerative medicine becomes fully available to all it would be less likely for people to risk their lives in dangerous endeavors, not just in space travel but also in other things such as war. Without any doubt being a soldier is a very risky occupation for it increases immensely the odds of losing one’s life prematurely. When everyone can live for 1,000 years (or more) then many may not want to risk their lives for any cause or reason because of the greater value their life will be worth to them. Consequently the incentives to find peaceful outcomes to all forms of disagreements may become significantly higher. However, this would not apply to fundamentalist terrorists who do not have any doubt that after death they will have a more luxurious existence than anyone could ever have alive. Still it might provide a much added incentive for the rest of the world to defeat terrorism and achieve peace…

Can universally available regenerative medicine promote world peace? Or are we all just going to become cowards?

About the Author: Kieran Griffith is a voluntary consultant to the SENS Foundation for developing medical techniques that extend lifespan indefinitely. He has degrees in psychology, the Humanities and Space Science and is planning a future career in the field of commercial spaceflight.

Related articles
  • Can Terraforming Venus Be The Solution To Population Growth? (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)

Filed Under: Op Ed Tagged With: immortality, Kieran Griffith, Life extension

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Staying Sane in an Insane World
  • IASEAI’25 vs. The AI Action Summit: Will AI Be Driven by Cooperation or Competition?
  • “Conversations with the Future” Epilogue: Events Can Create the Future
  • Donald J. Robertson on How to Think Like Socrates in the Age of AI
  • Dr. Jad Tarifi of Integral AI: “We Now Have All the Ingredients for AGI”

Categories

  • Articles
  • Best Of
  • Featured
  • Featured Podcasts
  • Funny
  • News
  • Op Ed
  • Podcasts
  • Profiles
  • Reviews
  • ReWriting the Human Story
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • What if?

Join SingularityWeblog

Over 4,000 super smart people have subscribed to my newsletter in order to:

Discover the Trends

See the full spectrum of dangers and opportunities in a future of endless possibilities.

Discover the Tools

Locate the tools and resources you need to create a better future, a better business, and a better you.

Discover the People

Identify the major change agents creating the future. Hear their dreams and their fears.

Discover Yourself

Get inspired. Give birth to your best ideas. Create the future. Live long and prosper.

singularity-logo-2

Sign up for my weekly newsletter.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
You must accept the Terms and Conditions.
Get Started!

Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
  • Home
  • About
  • Start
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Media
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Ethos: “Technology is the How, not the Why or What. So you can have the best possible How but if you mess up your Why or What you will do more damage than good. That is why technology is not enough.” Nikola Danaylov

Copyright © 2009-2025 Singularity Weblog. All Rights Reserved | Terms | Disclosure | Privacy Policy