• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
singularityweblog-create-the-future-logo-thumb
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact

progress

Prof. Ada Palmer on Pandemics, Progress, History, Teleology and the Singularity

May 16, 2020 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/821277562-singularity1on1-ada-palmer.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Ada Palmer is a Professor in History researching the history of science, religion, progress, culture and many other fascinating topics. She is also a science fiction author of the award-winning Terra Ignota series beginning with Too Like the Lightning, which explores a twenty-fifth civilization of voluntary citizenship and borderless nations.

During this 2h 45 min interview with Prof. Ada Palmer, we cover a variety of interesting topics such as: why she is first and foremost someone who studies how cultures change over time; why there is nothing more similar to the future than the past; the Black Death and COVID-19; the Renaissance and the myth of the Golden Age;  the invention, definition, and trajectory of progress; why Francis Bacon thought that being a scientist was the best kind of Christian charity; Ada’s take on transhumanism and Ray Kurzweil’s 6 epochs of the singularity; the birth of atheism; whether more intelligence and better technology make us better; the usefulness of useless knowledge; her award-winning science fiction novel Too Like the Lightning, how cantaloupe brought about the French Revolution.

My favorite quotes that I will take away from this conversation with Ada Palmer are:

The problem with teleological narratives is that they make us ignore the fact that a huge portion of real change is made by people who didn’t intend that change to happen.

Science Fiction fights our ethical battles before we have to fight them.

Teamwork: The small things that we are achieving that feel small are the way that the civilization-wide big things happen. The more I look at history and zoom in the less it is the geniuses and the people whose names we know that made the world shift and the more it is, in fact, the microscopic – from a historical standpoint, teamwork of everybody. So never feel that the stuff you’re doing isn’t important.

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation or become a patron on Patreon.

Who is Ada Palmer?

Ada Palmer is a cultural and intellectual historian focusing on radical thought and the recovery of the classics in early modern Europe, especially the Italian Renaissance. An Associate Professor in the History Department with affiliations in Classics, Gender Studies, and the Institute on the Formation of Knowledge, she works on the history of science, religion, heresy, freethought, atheism, censorship, books, printing, and the networks of money and power that enable cultural production. Her current research focuses on censorship during information revolutions, and how studying the print revolution can help lawmakers and corporations make wiser choices during the digital revolution. She is also a science fiction and fantasy novelist, author of the award-winning Terra Ignota series beginning with Too Like the Lightning (Tor Books), which explores a twenty-fifth civilization of voluntary citizenship and borderless nations, written in the style of an eighteenth-century philosophical novel. She is also a composer, studies anime and manga, works as a consultant for anime and manga publishers, blogs for Tor.com, and writes the philosophy and travel blog ExUrbe.com.

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: progress

Why I Am an Optimist

January 13, 2011 by Socrates

People sometimes ask me why am I such an optimist about the progress of technology in general and the technological singularity in particular?

Well, my reply is simple.

I choose to focus on the upside. I choose to be a deliberate, conscious optimist.

That is not to say that I suggest we ought to ignore the many dangers that lie certainly ahead of us. What it means is that, once I’ve done my best and the die is cast, the only thing that is left for me is to enjoy the ride, focus on the bright side of life and have a little sense of humor on the way.

Tony Robins says that, whether consciously or unconsciously, at any given moment in time we are always making the following decisions:

1. What do I focus on?

2. What does it mean for me?

3. How do I feel about it?

4. What am I going to do about it?

I choose to be very deliberate in those choices. Because not making a conscious choice is just but another kind of a choice – I believe, almost certainly, a very bad one.

So, I prefer to be a conscious optimist, rather than an unconscious pessimist.

I have chosen to:

1. Focus on the evolution of technology as exhibited by the exponential growth of development in computer science, artificial intelligence, genetics, robotics and nanotechnologies.

2. Find the positive meaning and unparalleled opportunities of the above, not only for me but also for all of us.

3. Feel great about the future – both mine and that of the rest of humanity.

4. Start and host Singularity Symposium and Singularity Weblog – to popularize, discuss and shape our future, without forgetting or denying the equally great risks and responsibilities we are collectively carrying on the way.

Sometimes people interrupt me and say:

But you are an atheist! How can you be a true optimist if you don’t believe in God! For only the Almighty can guarantee that in the end things will turn out for the best.

Well, would you allow me to be a pessimist about God? And, never-the-less, still insist I am an optimist?

Why do we need someone else (even God) to take responsibility for the outcome? Why can’t we embrace the fact that with our exponentially growing power comes an equally growing responsibility? Should we blame Santa if our kinds don’t like their presents?

I accept there is no guarantee that in the 21st century things will turn out for the best. Yet this realization does not make me into an immoral, evil or desperate nihilist. Just the opposite. It allows me to appreciate the  time I spend here, the freedom I am presented with and the consequent gravity of my personal, and our collective decisions.

It is up to us create the outcome whatever it may turn out to be – heaven or hell, apocalypse or Utopia. It is up to us to make a choice and take deliberate action towards accomplishing our goals. And even if it is not up to us, I prefer to err and take action, rather than sit idly and observe from the sidelines of history.

No, I don’t need God’s existence or help – I know that I can be happy, prosperous and good without Him. Just like I can choose to be a miserable, evil, stupid and murderous killer of innocent people, all while shouting my particular version of God’s name.

It was not God who lifted us from the holes in the ground – we did. And it will not be his fault if we end up back there. It was our curiosity to explore and our intelligence to discover, channeled through the scientific method of inquiry, that did so.

Thus, I choose to be guided by philosophy rather than superstition.

I choose to ask uncomfortable, skeptical questions rather than accept easy, convenient answers.

I embrace the scientific method and adore the Symphony of Science because there is real poetry in the real world and science is the poetry of reality. The same spiritual fulfillment that people seek in religion, can be found everywhere in the universe.

***

Yes, in this century we are probably going to face the biggest challenges humanity has ever faced and we can approach that pivotal moment either as pessimists or optimists.

We could embrace Murphy’s law and claim that if things can go wrong (isn’t that always a possibility for anything worthwhile?!) then they surely will. Or we can choose to embrace Moore’s Law and say that things always get better, cheaper and faster, while we clearly have safer, more comfortable, longer and healthier lifes.

We can proclaim that the TechnoCalyps is coming. Or that the Singularity is Near.

We can say that God has made us mortal. Or realize that it is us who made Him immortal.

It was not God, it was Science that changed the world and in this century it will help us change it more than ever: to transcend biology, go Beyond Human, build Human v2.0 and maybe even live forever.

Indeed, soon we’ll have to make a decision: Onwards to Utopia or backwards to the Dark Ages.

I believe that we not only can but actually will have “A Better Future” ahead of us. (and “Better You” too.)

***

Let me finish off this personal manifesto with 2 great videos, that may help you visualize the mixture of science and sense of humor, at the corner-stone of my optimism.

The first video is from BBC Channel Four. In it, statistics guru and program host Hans Rosling takes us through the last 200 years of global progress as measured in terms of life span and income. I believe it makes a very powerful argument, both visually and otherwise, as to why we ought to be all optimists.

The second video is from Monthy Python‘s eternally funny and equally brilliant Life of Brian.

For me, sense of humor, rather than belief in God, comes rather handy when my very limited personal knowledge and logic fail to deliver enough optimism. I think that it can work for your too…

I see that humanity’s cup is already half full and we have the best chance ever to fill it up in this century.

That is why I choose to be an optimist!

And what about you?

Related articles
  • A Transhumanist Manifesto (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)
  • The Change Agent: Onwards to Utopia or backwards to the Dark Ages? (singularityblog.singularitysymposium.com)
  • Hans Rosling Shows You 200 Years of Global Growth in 4 Minutes (video) (singularityhub.com)

Filed Under: Funny, Op Ed Tagged With: Exponential growth, God, progress, Socrates, Technological Singularity

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Staying Sane in an Insane World
  • IASEAI’25 vs. The AI Action Summit: Will AI Be Driven by Cooperation or Competition?
  • “Conversations with the Future” Epilogue: Events Can Create the Future
  • Donald J. Robertson on How to Think Like Socrates in the Age of AI
  • Dr. Jad Tarifi of Integral AI: “We Now Have All the Ingredients for AGI”

Categories

  • Articles
  • Best Of
  • Featured
  • Featured Podcasts
  • Funny
  • News
  • Op Ed
  • Podcasts
  • Profiles
  • Reviews
  • ReWriting the Human Story
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • What if?

Join SingularityWeblog

Over 4,000 super smart people have subscribed to my newsletter in order to:

Discover the Trends

See the full spectrum of dangers and opportunities in a future of endless possibilities.

Discover the Tools

Locate the tools and resources you need to create a better future, a better business, and a better you.

Discover the People

Identify the major change agents creating the future. Hear their dreams and their fears.

Discover Yourself

Get inspired. Give birth to your best ideas. Create the future. Live long and prosper.

singularity-logo-2

Sign up for my weekly newsletter.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
You must accept the Terms and Conditions.
Get Started!

Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
  • Home
  • About
  • Start
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Media
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Ethos: “Technology is the How, not the Why or What. So you can have the best possible How but if you mess up your Why or What you will do more damage than good. That is why technology is not enough.” Nikola Danaylov

Copyright © 2009-2025 Singularity Weblog. All Rights Reserved | Terms | Disclosure | Privacy Policy