You and I, Robot

Steve Morris /

Posted on: April 26, 2013 / Last Modified: April 26, 2013

Isaac Asimov in his novel I, Robot, famously proposed the three laws of robotics:

handshake with robot

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

But I don’t think this is a promising way forward (and presumably neither did Asimov, since his novel highlights a fatal flaw in the rules). Rules and laws are a weak way of ordering society, partly because they always get broken. Our entire legal system seems to be based not on laws, but on dealing with the consequences when laws are broken.

In the Bible, God gave Moses Ten Commandments. I’m willing to bet that they were all broken within a week.

In the Garden of Eden there was only One Rule, and it didn’t take long before that was lying in tatters.

You may think that some rules can’t be broken. You may tell me that 1 + 1 = 2. Really? And what if I tell you that 1 + 1 = 3? What are you gonna do about it?

You see, rules only work when everyone agrees with them. They need to be bottom-up, not top-down. If people don’t like rules, then rules get broken. I personally believe strongly in the rule that says everyone should drive on the same side of the road and I’ve never broken it. But if I think that 30 mph is a stupid speed limit right out here in the middle of nowhere, then I’m going to put my foot on the accelerator.

On the other hand, I’ve never murdered a single member of my family. And not because the law forbids it, but because I love them. In fact, I would go to extraordinary lengths to protect them, even breaking other rules and laws if necessary.

That’s the kind of strong AI we need. Robots that protect us, nurture us, forgive us and tolerate our endless failures and annoying habits. In short, robots capable of love. Ones that we can love back in return.

 

Steve-Morris-thumb11About the author:

Steve Morris studied Physics at the University of Oxford and now writes about technology at S21.com and his personal blog.

 

Browse More

hammer-of-ai-butterfly-among-nails-preview

The Hammer of AI: When Every Problem Looks Like a Nail

A solitary Japanese Kyudo archer at full draw, silhouetted against a setting sun over distant mountains.

There Is No Formula: Why AI Cannot Solve What Matters Most

Archery target with six arrows clustered tightly off-center, missing the painted bullseye. Visual metaphor for Goodhart's Law in AI: the system optimized perfectly for the wrong target.

The Why Is a Discipline: Why a Good Why Is Also Not Enough

A two-faced Janus marble bust on a museum plinth, one face classical stone, the other etched with faint glowing circuit traces, illustrating the dual nature of AI as cure or poison.

The AI Paradox: Cure or Poison?

Dune Part Three official title card — Dune Messiah meaning explained

Dune Is Not What You Think: The Warning Frank Herbert Meant Us to Hear

A human conductor leads an orchestra of AI robots, symbolizing the human skills that will matter in the age of artificial intelligence.

The Skills That Will Matter When AI Can Do Almost Everything

A smartphone depicted as a slot machine surrounded by abstract human figures, illustrating how social media engagement is designed to capture attention rather than facilitate real social interaction.

Facebook’s Quiet Confession: The Social Network Was a Lie

Living systems illustrating the limits of the machine metaphor

How Our Machine Story Shaped Modernity and Why It Can’t Shape the Future