• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
singularityweblog-create-the-future-logo-thumb
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact
  • About
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Contact

transhumanism

Transhumanism 101 with Natasha Vita-More

September 5, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/196541172-singularity1on1-transhumanism-natasha-vita-more.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Transhumanism is both misunderstood and feared. Ignorant people with an ideological agenda have labeled it “the most dangerous idea.” I thought that it was time to bring some basic intellectual clarity on the topic, and who is better prepared to help us do that than “the first female philosopher of transhumanism”!?

Dr. Natasha Vita-More has already been a guest on Singularity 1 on 1. Her first interview was both interesting and popular and I very much enjoyed talking to her about her life and work. This time our conversation is more focused on issues strictly related to transhumanism and the basics thereof, so I thought I’d call this episode Transhumanism 101.

During our conversation, Natasha covers a wide variety of topics such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and the effect it had on transhumanism, science fiction, and science in general; the negative perception and fear of transhumanism stemming from some more recent publications such as Bill Joy’s Why The Future Doesn’t Need Us and Francis Fukuyama’s Post-Human Future; Natasha’s definition of transhumanism; similarities and differences between transhuman, posthuman and cyborg; critical thinking as one of the basic tenets of transhumanism; important writings such as Max More’s Towards a Futurist Philosophy, Eric Drexler’s Engines of Creation and Carl Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World; her Ph.D. dissertation on human enhancement and life expansion; some of the reasons that people fear transhumanism and how to turn that around; some of her upcoming projects such as The Transhumanist Reader and H+TV as well as artistic events and conferences that she supports.

One of my favorite quotes that I will take away from this interview with Natasha is her call to “Get creative about the future!”

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Who is Natasha Vita-More?

Natasha Vita-More, Ph.D. is the founder and creative director of esDESiGN and the producer and host of H+TV online. Her research concerns the design aesthetics of human enhancement and radical life extension, with a focus on emerging and speculative sciences and technologies. Her conceptual future human design “Primo Posthuman” has been featured in Wired, Harper’s Bazaar, Marie Claire, The New York Times, U.S. News & World Report, Net Business, Teleopolis, and Village Voice. She has appeared in over twenty-four televised documentaries on the future and culture, and has exhibited media artworks at National Centre for Contemporary Arts, Brooks Memorial Museum, Institute of Contemporary Art, Women In Video, Telluride Film Festival, and United States Film Festival and recently “Evolution Haute Couture: Art and Science in the Post-Biological Age” and is the recipient of several awards: First Place Award at Brooks Memorial Museum, Special Recognition at Women in Video, and special recognition for “Futures Podcast Series”.

Dr. Vita-More is a proponent of human rights and ethical means for human enhancement and is published in Artifact, Technoetic Arts, Nanotechnology Perceptions, Sistemi Intelligenti, Metaverse Creativity, D’ARS, and the Global Spiral. She is co-editor of the forthcoming book The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (Wiley-Blackwell 2013).

Related articles
  • Giulio Prisco on Singularity 1 on 1: The End Is Not The End
  • Anders Sandberg on Singularity 1 on 1: Embrace Strangeness
  • Question Everything: Max More on Singularity 1 on 1
  • Natasha Vita-More on Singularity 1 on 1

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: Natasha Vita-More, transhumanism

Giulio Prisco on The Turing Church: The End Is Not The End

August 25, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/196134182-singularity1on1-giulio-prisco.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Giulio Prisco is an Italian information technology virtual reality consultant, as well as a writer, futurist, and transhumanist.

Formerly a senior manager in the European Space Agency, Prisco is a physicist and computer scientist who started his career at CERN.

Giulio is an avid advocate of cryonics. He is also a member of the advisory board of the Lifeboat Foundation and a founding member of the Order of Cosmic Engineers and the Turing Church, fledgling organizations that claim that the benefits of the technological singularity would be viable alternatives to the promises of major religious groups.

Given Prisco’s biography, when Catarina (Kryonica) suggested that I invite Giulio to Singularity 1 on 1, I was very happy to oblige.

During our conversation, we cover a wide variety of topics such as: how Giulio got interested in transhumanism and the singularity; the inspirational role of science fiction in general and Arthur C. Clarke in particular; the many definitions of the technological singularity; transhumanism and why he is a singularitiarian who doesn’t believe in the singularity; happiness as the ultimate motivation; religion, spirituality, unreligion and science; the Order of Cosmic Engineers; The Turing Church; hope and resurrecting the dead.

My favorite quote that I will take away from this interview with Giulio Prisco is:

The end is not the end. Future science and technology may be able to resurrect us.

As always, you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down to watch the video interview in full. To show your support, you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Who is Giulio Prisco?

Giulio Prisco is a writer, technology expert, futurist, cosmist, and transhumanist. A former manager in European science and technology centers, he writes and speaks on a wide range of topics, including science, information technology, emerging technologies, virtual worlds, space exploration, and future studies. He is especially interested in the convergence of science, religion, technology, and spirituality.

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: Technological Singularity, transhumanism

Transhumanist Anders Sandberg: Embrace Strangeness

July 22, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/195341547-singularity1on1-anders-sandberg-embrace-strangeness.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Dr. Anders Sandberg is a well-known transhumanist, futurist, and computational neuroscientist who is currently a research fellow at the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. I enjoyed talking to him last time he was on Singularity 1 on 1 and was happy to have him back for another one.

During our second conversation with Anders, we cover a wide variety of topics such as transhumanism and the ethics thereof; the limits of being human; the Epic of Gilgamesh and our quest for immortality; overcoming death and enhancing life; life expectancy and our willingness to take risks; the potential for enhancement arms-races; the likelihood of armed conflict between transhumanists and neo-luddites; the most likely path to human enhancement; personal versus collective enhancement; hive-minds, distributed intelligence, the Borg and individuality; post-humanism and mind uploading.

My favorite quote that I will take away from this interview with Dr. Sandberg is:

That which does not kill us only makes us stranger.

As always, you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down to watch the video interview in full. To show your support, you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Who is Anders Sandberg?

Anders Sandberg’s research at the Future of Humanity Institute centers on societal and ethical issues surrounding human enhancement and new technology, as well as estimating the capabilities and underlying science of future technologies. Topics of particular interest include enhancement of cognition, cognitive biases, technology-enabled collective intelligence, neuroethics, and public policy. He has worked on this within the EU project ENHANCE, where he also was responsible for public outreach and online presence. Besides scientific publications in neuroscience, ethics, and future studies he has also participated in the public debate about human enhancement internationally. Anders also holds an AXA Research Fellowship.

He has a background in computer science, neuroscience, and medical engineering. He obtained his Ph.D. in computational neuroscience from Stockholm University, Sweden, for work on neural network modeling of human memory. He has also been the scientific producer for the major neuroscience exhibition “Se Hjärnan!” (“Behold the Brain!”), organized by Swedish Travelling Exhibitions, the Swedish Research Council, and the Knowledge Foundation that toured Sweden 2005-2007. He is co-founder and writer for the think tank Eudoxa.

Related articles
  • Anders Sandberg on Singularity 1 on 1: We Are All Amazingly Stupid, But We Can Get Better
  • Daniel H. Wilson on Singularity 1 on 1: We Can’t Win Against Technology – We Are Technology!

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: Anders Sandberg, transhumanism

George Dvorsky: Specialization is for Insects

February 24, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/192424213-singularity1on1-george-dvorsky-transhumanism-paleo.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

This is my second interview with George Dvorsky.

The first time I had George on Singularity one-on-one, we ended up talking for 1 hour and 14 minutes. I am afraid that I enjoy his company so much that this time, we talked for almost 1 hour and 40 minutes.

During our conversation, we discuss issues such as Dvorsky’s agonizing decision to stop being vegetarian and embrace the Paleo diet; cross-fit training, organic farming and the cost of food; the seeming contradiction between transhumanism and paleo/cross-fitness; animal enhancement (aka animal uplift), human-equivalent non-person rights and the list of candidate species; mass extinction and the Fermi paradox; SETI and the Dysonian approach that George and co are suggesting; the potential for and implications of friendly and unfriendly alien intelligence.

This interview is long, but if you are interested in the above topics, then it is very much worth watching.

One of the main points that I will take away is a brilliant quote that Dvorsky brought to my attention:

A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. Robert A. Heinlein

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Who is George Dvorsky?

Canadian futurist, ethicist, and sociologist, George Dvorsky has a popular blog called Sentient Developments. He has written and spoken extensively about the impacts of cutting-edge science and technology – particularly as they pertain to the improvement of human performance and experience. George is a founding member of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies and is the founder and program director for its Rights of Non-Human Persons program.

In addition, George is the co-founder and president of the Toronto Transhumanist Association and has served on the Board of Directors for Humanity+ for two terms. George has been interviewed by such publications as The Guardian, the BBC, Radio Free Europe, and Beliefnet. He made an appearance on the CBC’s The Hour and has been profiled in NOW and This Magazine. His work has been cited in such publications as the New York Times, Forbes, and Slate. He has also written for such publications as The Humanist, Canadian Freethinker, Cryonics Magazine, and a number of Thomson & Gale university texts.

George is also an avid CrossFitter, an ancestral health enthusiast, and an accomplished music performer, composer, and recording engineer.

Related articles
  • Singularity Podcast: George Dvorsky on Transhumanism and the Singularity
  • Singularity University Lectures: Science Searches for ET by Seth Shostak
  • Sentient Developments Podcast Rebooted

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: Animal rights, George Dvorsky, transhumanism

HackLab.TO President Eric Boyd on DIY Transhumanism

February 20, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/192267344-singularity1on1-eric-boyd-diy-transhumanism.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Last week, I visited Eric Boyd at HackLab.TO. While there, I interviewed Eric for my Singularity 1 on 1 podcast. Eric is the president of HackLab.TO, one of the co-founders of StumbleUpon, and a regular public speaker on topics such as cyborgs, transhumanism, electronic jewelry, and hacking.

In the past, I have lacked the proper equipment to do an on-site audio or video recording without borrowing it from my friends or my very generous brother-in-law. Fortunately, though, last week I received the biggest anonymous donation ever received at Singularity Weblog. (Thank you, anonymous donor.) The money allowed me to purchase a brand new Canon VIXIA HF G10 camcorder as well as a Fujifilm X10 photo camera, and thus equipped, I headed to HackLab.TO.

During our conversation, we discussed issues such as Eric’s early interest in technology; his co-founding of StumbleUpon and eventual leaving the company; his work in Silicon Valley and involvement in NoiseBridge – the hackerspace in San Francisco; building a vibrant hacker and techno-community in Canada; SenseBridge, the philosophy behind it and the electronic jewelry he makes (e.g. the Sound Spark, Mood Spark, and North Paw); body augmentation and transhumanism; religion and the technological singularity; why humans are naturally born cyborgs; early adopters of tech and judging when to join a revolution so that we are not left behind.

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Who is Eric Boyd?

Eric Boyd is the founder of Sensebridge. He was born and raised in Ontario Canada, on a small chicken farm. He attended Queens University for engineering, graduating in 2003, but not before co-founding StumbleUpon.com. After graduating, he lived and worked in Silicon Valley at a high-tech startup, designing industrial sensors and helping install them at semi-conductor fabs across the United States. Around this same time, he also became fascinated with fashion and style, watching Beauty and The Geek and transforming his own personal style.

He now lives and works in Toronto Canada, where he is President of Hacklab.to, a technology community space. He gives frequent public talks on wearable electronics, the combination of electronics and fashion that is most noticeable these days in performers’ costumes. At Sensebridge, Eric designs manufactures and sells new sensory interfaces, like the North Paw compass anklet (it vibrates to tell you what way is north, giving you a sense of direction), and electronic jewelry, like Heart Spark (it flashes lights in time with your heartbeat, broadcasting your emotions). Eric is a trustee of the Toronto Awesome Foundation, which gives away $1000 each month to support an awesome project somewhere in Toronto. His recent favorites include the Toronto Kiss Map and Cardboard Fort Night. Eric is also involved with the Toronto Guerrilla Gardeners, making the more beautiful one unauthorized garden at a time.

Eric blogs at digitalcrusader.ca. You can learn more about wearable electronic senses at sensebridge.net, and see the electronic jewelry at sensebridge.com.

Related articles
  • HackLab.TO: Toronto’s Hacker Collective
  • Ramez Naam on Singularity 1 on 1: The World Needs Innovation. Don’t Be a Spectator, Participate!
  • Robert J. Sawyer on Humanity 2.0

Filed Under: Podcasts Tagged With: cyborg, Eric Boyd, transhumanism

Ramez Naam: The World Needs Innovation. Don’t Be a Spectator, Participate!

February 9, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/191930281-singularity1on1-ramez-naam-more-than-human.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

Yesterday I interviewed Ramez Naam for my singularity podcast.

Ramez is the author of an award-winning, timely and easy-to-digest book on the ethical, political, economic, and other implications of transhumanism titled More Than Human.

Since I enjoyed reading the book very much I simply had to interview Naam and ask him to talk more about his ideas. During our conversation we discuss a variety of topics such as Ramez’ early interest philosophy, physics, and computer science; the motivation behind his work at Microsoft on projects such as MS Word, Outlook, and the Bing search engine; the inspiration behind his book on transhumanism; human evolution and the way technology has become a crucial part of who we are; playing God in general and altering the human DNA in particular; life extension and the probability of overcoming death; artificial intelligence, the technological singularity and why he is not a singularitarian; the limits to growth, resource depletion, innovation, and optimism.

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation, or become a patron on Patreon.

Who is Ramez Naam?

Ramez Naam is a computer scientist and entrepreneur. He is the author of More Than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement, which the LA Times called “a terrific survey of current work and future possibilities in gene therapy, neurotechnology, and other fields.” For More Than Human, Naam was awarded the 2005 H.G. Wells Award for Contributions to Transhumanism.

Ramez spent 13 years at Microsoft, where he lead development on early versions of Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Internet Explorer, and most recently the Bing search engine.

Naam is a Fellow of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies and blogs at UnbridledSpeculation.com. He lives in Seattle, where he is currently working on his next book The Infinite Resource: Harnessing the Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet.

Filed Under: Podcasts, Profiles Tagged With: post human, Ramez Naam, transhumanism

Robert J. Sawyer on Humanity 2.0

February 8, 2012 by Socrates

Robert J. Sawyer and Socrates

Robert J. Sawyer is one of my all-time favorite science fiction writers. Thus, when I heard that the Literary Review of Canada and TV Ontario’s Big Ideas are co-hosting a talk by Robert at the Gardiner Museum, I simply had to attend.

Robert J. Sawyer is one of those very rare people who truly know a lot about everything and — even rarer ones — who can communicate clearly and convincingly about what they know. Below you can watch the recording of Sawyer’s very engaging, eloquent and empassionate presentation touching up on a variety of issues such as cosmology, SETI, transhumanism, the singularity, longevity, mind uploading and other ways of upgrading humanity to version 2.0.

The event was held on November 21, 2011 in Toronto and it took a couple of months before it was eventually aired on TVO and posted online.

Program Synopsis: When Marshal McLuhan published Understanding Media, in 1964, the U of T English professor’s radical arguments about technology’s role in shaping human existence made him a unique media oracle. Now, 100 years after McLuhan’s birth, many simply take as given that our future will be shaped, not by ethical or cultural precepts, but by our fast-changing technological advances.

In fact, we’re approaching the moment —not too far off—at which computer intelligence will exceed that of humans. Today, some already dream of uploading their consciousnesses into artificial bodies or virtual worlds; others wish to radically prolong their lives or enhance their bodies through biotechnology. These changes are feared by some, embraced by others, and point to key questions: What will it mean to be human in the future? Can we look forward to a Utopian tomorrow? Might some of us simply become obsolete? What will it mean to be human in the future?

Robert J. Sawyer discusses how to approach our brave new future without (too much) fear and trembling and points out that uploading consciousness into virtual worlds and prolonging life through biotechnology are already being contemplated.

Who is Robert J. Sawyer?

Called “The Dean of Canadian Science Fiction” by The Ottawa Citizen and “just about the best science-fiction writer out there these days” by The Denver Rocky Mountain News, Sawyer is one of only eight writers in history (and the only Canadian) to win all three of the science-fiction field’s top honors for best novel of the year – the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, and the John W. Campbell Memorial Award. He has taught writing at the University of Toronto, Ryerson University, Humber College, the National University of Ireland, and the Banff Centre. His keen insights into the human impact of technological change have led to consulting work for corporate clients such as Google, and Sawyer has also advised bodies from the Canadian Federal Department of Justice to the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Related articles
  • Robert J. Sawyer on Singularity 1 on 1: The Human Adventure is Just Beginning
  • The WWW Trilogy: Wake, Watch and Wonder Book Review

Filed Under: Video Tagged With: Robert J. Sawyer, singularity, transhumanism

Rachel Haywire: Art is Intellectual and the Intellect is Artistic

January 28, 2012 by Socrates

https://media.blubrry.com/singularity/feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/191665332-singularity1on1-rachel-haywire.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: RSS

A couple of months ago I interviewed Rachel Haywire for Singularity 1 on 1. I had some difficulties in posting this interview but, since those were eventually resolved, better late than never…

Rachel Haywire is a multi-media artist and writer currently residing in Los Angeles, California. She is the founder of The Human 2.0 Council which is a Transhumanist network of artists and students on the edge of society and media.

Known for bridging the gap between the counterculture and academia she founded the Extreme Futurist Festival which is a 2-day entertainment and tech convention focusing on radical performers and voices of the new evolution.

Rachel is known as an “antisocial media coach” and is considered a leading voice in digital media. She is credited for bringing DIY Transhumanism into the mainstream.

I have to admit that I worked for 10 hours before my interview with Rachel and was totally wasted by the time we started. Thus I began our conversation a bit low on energy but was quickly energized by her willingness to share frankly some of her very personal struggles and limitations.

In addition, during the interview, we discuss issues such as: what does it mean to be “anti-social media coach”‘; how Rachel got interested in transhumanism and issues surrounding the technological singularity; the difference between transhumanism and cyber-punk; being an extreme futurist and organizing the Extreme Future Fest; the early Italian futurists such as Marinetti and their fascist inclinations; women in transhumanism; DIY synthetic biology, human enhancement, and bio-hacking; the risks of early adopters; flying as the ultimate freedom; Rachel’s appreciation for ballet and love of dance in general; neuro-diversity; artificial intelligence and others.

My favorite quote from Rachel (apart from the title) is:

Just because you are smart, it doesn’t mean that you can’t be cultured. And just because you are cultured it doesn’t mean that you can’t be smart. There is intelligence and there is artistic merit, and those two things should, can, and do exist at the same time.

As always you can listen to or download the audio file above or scroll down and watch the video interview in full. To show your support you can write a review on iTunes, make a direct donation or become a patron on Patreon.

 

Extreme Future Fest Opening: Rachel Haywire and Michael Anissimov

Related articles
  • Visual Culture and Transhumanism
  • The Complete 2011 Singularity Summit Video Collection
  • Extreme Futurist Festival (acceleratingfuture.com)

Filed Under: Podcasts, Profiles Tagged With: Rachel Haywire, transhumanism

Do We Need to Have a “Future Day”?

September 28, 2011 by wpengine

“In thinking about how to get people interested in and excited about Transhumanist ideas explicitly, one idea I thought about was to create a holiday for the future. You think about all these holidays we have they are all about past events, but what if there were a holiday specifically oriented towards future events. So you could have many of them, you could have a ‘Singularity Day’, an ‘Artilect War Day’ for the future war, or simply a ‘Future Day’, to try and bring people together around the idea of creating a better future”

The remarks above were made by Ben Goertzel during the question and answer period of last week’s H+ Leadership Summit (see the full video at the end of the article), a discussion held in virtual world Second Life on leadership and the realization of Transhumanist goals. Author and polymath Howard Bloom, who positively influenced the musical careers of Michael Jackson, Prince, John Cougar Mellencamp, Kiss, Queen, Bette Midler, Billy Joel, Diana Ross, Simon & Garfunkel, and many others, responded enthusiastically to Goertzel’s suggestion, calling the idea ‘fabulous’, and stating that in addition to being a source of excitement and means to raise awareness regarding Transhumanist ideas, an event of this nature could have broad reaching societal affect, potentially altering the prevailing mood of the time by turning over a new leaf of optimism. Bloom argues that in periods of economic collapse “we lose our sense of a future,” and “the thing that pulls us out of the trenches, and back up onto the landscape and charging toward the future is someone’s willingness to give us a vision of the future”. During the 1930s, the vision serving this function was the vision to electrify every home – which at the time, he points out, seemed “absolutely absurd.” And having a vision, in and of itself, can have a leveraging effect, he says, as a vision of the future “pulls us into the future.”

When it comes to optimism and moving forward, the Transhumanist outlook has a great deal to offer. Before us we see perpetual and accelerating progress, important breakthroughs occurring regularly, with radical predictions being met and exceeded, and knowledge exploding. And the Transhumanist vision more broadly is one of innovation and pushing beyond boundaries. But, as Bloom and others point out, in the interest of reaching as many people as possible, it’s best the holiday not be specifically Transhumanist, and instead be something more general so that everyone could readily understand and easily connect with. Natasha Vita-More adds that it should be something “beyond religion, beyond politics, and has the vision of expanding our horizons.”

The success of related events, such as Yuri’s Night:A World Space Party, an event celebrated annually in now more than 30 countries, indicates viability in the ‘Future Day’ idea. Yuri’s Night, in addition to honoring Yuri Garagin – the first human in space, who flew the Vostok 1 spaceship on April 12, 1961, is meant to inspire interest in space exploration, and more generally, science. I attended the event this year in Edmonton Alberta, held at the Edmonton Space and Science Center, and found it did just that. But ‘Future Day’ could be much more expansive. Natasha Vita-More and others identify other successful future oriented events in the past, such as the ‘World’s Fair’ (which this year was held only in China) and Bruce Mau’s ‘Massive Change’ initiative, as examples of events with similar magnitude and/or spirit to what a ‘Future Day’ could strive to become. Bloom remarks “we need people to apply their minds to the future the way they applied their minds to the World’s Fairs in the past”, where projects just kept get “bigger, and bigger, and bigger.”

Holidays have many positive social functions. For one, they create connections across entire societies, and sometimes internationally. In celebrating, people develop parallel experiences, and forge subtle bonds. ‘Future Day’, then, could offer people a means to relate to one another regarding the future.  And as Goertzel points out, a holiday celebrating the future could serve to unify diverse groups already oriented around future building, by “giving them something to contribute to without making them feel as though it was diluting their mission.”

Holidays are traditionally backward looking in nature, and a means of cultural preservation rather than evolution. ‘Future Day’ could have the opposite effect, making people more enthusiastic about change, and offering a vision that makes us more inclined to reach toward the future, and less afraid to let go of past ideas that may be interfering with progress.

So what features might a holiday for the future have?

Festivals: Cutting edge technology exhibits, musical events, fanfare. I can imagine more digital versions of colorful international festivals like the Holi festival and future oriented large-scale art installations the scale of Burning Man.

Activities for Kids: A great way to introduce kids to Transhumanist ideas. Could include school projects in the way kids do Christmas projects – plays about the future, crafts about the future etc.

Parades: A good way to get corporate sponsorship, and a good way to get media attention. Another great way to get kids interested in futurist ideas.

Parties: All kinds of parties. Wild parties celebrating future social liberation, cognitive enhancement parties, costume parties, dress like your avatar parties.

Celebrity Endorsement: Leonardo DiCaprio endorsed official secular holiday Earth Day in year 2000, and celebrities endorse social causes all the time. Future Day could also have cutting edge, provocative appeal that would motivate celebrities to associate themselves with the event.

Peaceful Protests: My guess is that as more people become excited about the future and want to see certain technologies developed sooner rather than later, more will come to feel there are unnecessary obstacles standing in the way of future tech. To date there is not much activism going on related directly to achieving Transhumanist goals, although some have taken matters into their own hands, in the form of Singularity political letter writing. Using ‘Earth Day’ as an example – holidays offer an opportunity to raise awareness regarding political and social issues. There are many humanitarian aspects of Transhumanism worth campaigning for, and this could be one way in which university students are involved in ‘Future Day’.

The Second Life conversation on ‘Future Day’ concluded with agreement that the idea should be pursued, and that refining the vision and working out the details would occur between H+ board members over the next couple weeks. Board members also discussed the benefits such an event would have for Transhumanism more specifically, such as shifting the focus from risks and ethics to something with more vision and more ‘fun’, and creating a vehicle and franchise in which to deliver Transhumanist ideas to the public. It will be exciting to see what they come up with, and watch the idea evolve as others become involved in the planning.

About the Author:

Nikki Olson is a writer/researcher working on an upcoming book about the Singularity with Dr. Kim Solez, as well as relevant educational material for the Lifeboat Foundation. She has a background in philosophy and sociology, and has been involved extensively in Singularity research for 3 years. You can reach Nikki via email at [email protected].

Humanity+ community event in Second Life, September 15, 2011

[youtube]https://youtu.be/6TW6FnvUFcE[/youtube]

Related articles
  • Visual Culture and Transhumanism
  • What Does it Mean to be a Transhumanist?

Filed Under: Op Ed, What if? Tagged With: Ben Goertzel, Future Day, H+, Natasha Vita-More, transhumanism

Deus Ex: The Eyeborg Documentary

September 4, 2011 by Socrates

It has been some time ago that I first posted the Deus Ex: Human Revolution original trailer about the stunning video game from Eidos. The clip is so visually captivating that I am forced to re-watch it every once-in-a-while and ponder the myriad of profound issues that it touches on. Even more so, a reader of this blog once told me that it was seeing the Deus Ex trailer for the first time that made him aware of transhumanism and consequently pushed him to devote his life to studying it.

Enter Rob Spence. Those who missed my interview with Rob should know that he is known as the Eyeborg – a self proclaimed cyborg who lost an eye in an accident and replaced it with a wireless video camera. Rob is a wacky documentarian and recently joined forces with the gang from Square Enix to create Deus Ex: The Eyeborg Documentary.

When I posted the original trailer I asked: “What are the odds of those clips becoming reality?”

Well, as it turns out, this 15 minute documentary attempts to reply to that (rhetorical) question by investigating the latest in prosthetics, cybernetics and human augmentation.

So, how far are we from the future presented to us in Deus Ex: Human Revolution?

Check out the movie to find out!

Filed Under: Video Tagged With: Eyeborg, Rob Spence, transhumanism

Visual Culture and Transhumanism

September 2, 2011 by wpengine

‘Visual Culture’ has to do with the creation, transmission and perpetuation of ideas in culture by visual means. Imagery, including shapes, colors, logos, fonts, apparel, and more broadly, ‘styles’, become symbols acting to carry and transmit meaning in a particular culture, and communicate ideology. A culture’s symbols can originate in that culture, or be a combination of new and borrowed ideas and meaning from others. For instance ‘tie-dye’, although dating back to ~500 AD, in the West is seen primarily as a symbol of hippie culture, communicating a particular set of social, political, and lifestyle beliefs.

What can we identify in the Singularity and Transhumanist community as playing this particular role, and what ideology does some of the present visual culture communicate?

Transhumanist visual culture can be characterized broadly as forward looking imagery that captures Transhumanist concepts, such as augmented sensory experiences, redesigned bodies, indefinite lifespans, and so on. There is a long history of art in the Transhumanist movement, dating back to the late 1970s/early 1980s with the work of Natasha Vita-More, who named the Transhumanist art movement and wrote the Transhumanist Art Statement and Extropic Art Manifesto, as well as many other papers and presentations promoting and addressing this topic. Transhumanism, however, is now more an intellectual movement than anything else, being markedly less aesthetic than related movements such as the cyberpunk, psychedelic and industrial movements. And so unfortunately, the visual aspect of Transhumanist culture is not well known by many Transhumanists today, and at present does not hold a lot of significance for them. However, there are some rich visual elements abound, and from all corners of Transhumanist thought.

One prominent visual element of Transhumanist culture right now comes out of the work of Rachel Haywire, lead of Experiment Haywire, pioneer of machineKUNT records, founder of the multi-media arts and science festival Extreme Futurist Fest (EFF), and most recently, the Human 2.0 Council. Haywire is thought to be a major force contributing to cross pollination of Transhumanist and Industrial visual culture.

Haywire’s most explicitly Transhumanist projects, for instance, EFF and Human 2.0, deliberately incorporate industrial imagery. Why the crossover? Well for one, the ideology of the two movements in many ways coincides. For instance, Transhumanist’s share with industrial culture a belief in DIY biology/biohacking, which goes alongside tattoos and piercings for Industrialists. Pioneers in mixing Transhumanist and Industrial media are bands Front 242 and Front Line Assembly. Newer enthusiasts in this vein include Trimetrick, UCNX, Chris Coreline and Johan Ess. And industrial artists like Aunia Kahn readily incorporate Transhumanism into their art.

In discussing the motivations of the groups she leads and identifies with, Haywire writes “Transhumanism is not just a field of science for us. It is a lifestyle and an aesthetic. We are real life mutants and the soundtrack to our generation.” And the imagery for her projects is meant to express that. I would add that industrial imagery offers a different dimension from which to view Transhumanist concepts, often in a darker, more aggressive, more urgent, and in some ways more radical light – evoking a strong aesthetic response to the future.

Another source of visual culture in the Transhumanist movement comes from the logos of its institutions. One notable, although perhaps often over-looked logo, is that of the ‘Future of Humanity Institute’, which features the image of a black diamond.

The logo’s symbolism evokes thought on the existential risks faced by humanity via technology, in particular the possibility of a near future Great Filter. It is thought by some futurists that the greatest threats to human survival lay immediately ahead, as we approach the invention of technologies with the power to wipe out all of mankind.

The black diamond symbol is more widely associated with the ski and snowboard industry to mean ‘most difficult’, connoting ‘danger’. In search of a logo, Anders Sandberg explains how Nick Bostrom “saw the ski logo during a holiday and it clicked”. It’s not all doom and gloom, however, the Future of Humanity Institute also identifies with a lesser-known meaning behind the black diamond symbol related to logic. Sandberg writes: “The symbol also has a meaning in some branches of logic, representing “possibility”. Sandberg goes on to recount “I also liked it because it is a dynamic square: something solid, but potentially tipping over in one direction or another.”

The most original and arguably most optimistic visual culture elements associated with Transhumanism today are the work of Singularity Utopia. Her art is meant to affect, at times subconsciously, our views and behavior towards the future, as well as broaden the conceptual reach of Transhumanist ideas. She writes:

“My ‘Singularity ART’ is designed to open minds. Art is often recondite (esoteric) but hopefully the obscurity in my art is not excessive. Via my images I allude to intelligence exploding, thus upon this theme of explosiveness my images typically exhibit an overloaded celebratory aspect. My images represent a very exciting event. I want to capture the excessive abundance of supreme intelligence thus ‘excess’ is a feature of my images.

I want the explosiveness to be accessible to everyone, but for the vast majority of humans I realize extreme intelligence is currently inaccessible. Complexity and simplicity are the two balancing poles in my art. There is dichotomy between excess and minimalism. The concept of intelligence is simple but manifestations of intelligence appear complex for stupid people. Intelligence exploding is a simple concept, which people can theoretically imagine, but in practice many people simply do not have substantial imaginations thus they cannot visualize revolutionary new concepts.

I am influenced by Minimalism, Conceptual Art, and Dada. My Singularity ART is an explanation of massive intelligence for stupid people, therefore due to the mainstream stupidity of humans I hint at Dadaism. Intelligence is conceptually very Anti-Establishment, thus you see the rationale for my Dadaistic hints. Principally I focus on the ‘concept’ in my images because I don’t want people to become sidetracked by surface details, thus via minimal rendering I artistically present my ideas. The Singularity is very strange and powerful but it’s also very simple. I simply want people to comprehend the awesome utopian power of the Singularity, thus via a jolt from my art I try to open human minds. The Singularity is bursting-out, breaking free. Dependent upon the level of intelligence in the viewer, my art will operate on subconscious or conscious levels.”

Just breaking onto the scene of mainstream Transhumanist consciousness has been the art work of Sniff Code, author of the science fiction book Clone. The work is highly provocative and imaginative, coupling imagery with short essays, creative works, and transhumanist poetry. And just announced, Sniff Code will be teaming up with Haywire in designing the website imagery for Extreme Futurist Fest.

So what’s next in this domain? As the popularity of Transhumanism increases we are sure to see it grow and fill out aesthetically—coming to have more of its own identifiable style perhaps, as well as more symbols in which memes can be communicated. Such an evolution is integral to the evolution of Transhumanists more generally, as Vita-More explains in the Transhumanism Art Statement:

As Transhumanist Arts come into focus
As more artists join our efforts
As more designs are produced
As more music is composed
As more stories are written
As the tools and ideas of our art continue to evolve,
So too shall we.

About the Author:

Nikki Olson is a writer/researcher working on an upcoming book about the Singularity with Dr. Kim Solez, as well as relevant educational material for the Lifeboat Foundation. She has a background in philosophy and sociology, and has been involved extensively in Singularity research for 3 years. You can reach Nikki via email at [email protected].

Filed Under: Op Ed Tagged With: Natasha Vita-More, Rachel Haywire, singularity utopia, transhumanism

X-Men First Class: Transhumanism for the Masses or Aren’t We All Mutants?

June 11, 2011 by Socrates

Have you ever felt lonely, struggled to fit in and be normal or been rejected just because you’re different?

Have you ever sought to find out who you really are?

Have you ever wondered if there are others who feel like you?

If you have, then, you will probably like the new X-Men: First Class.

The fifth and, in my opinion, best installment of the series, is not a movie about being a comic superhero endowed with amazing powers. It is a movie about being human and facing all the accompanying eternal questions of the human condition. A movie about feeling different and trying to find your place. About striving to fit in, be accepted and normal. (Whatever that may mean?!) About finding out who you really are and embracing it all – the amazing as well as the imperfect parts of us.

We relate to the characters not because they have superhuman powers but because they have very human problems.

Transhuman is human. Just a more gifted one. But talent often undermines character and the same age old questions are not only still relevant but even more acute than ever. Thus the film depicts the X-Men as a mirror image of our imperfect humanity, with all of its faults and failures.

Superheroes or (trans)humans?

In addition, X-Men: First Class weaves in and touches on a variety of other important topics such as: war and peace, genocide, transhumanism and bio-hacking, evolution and the birth of a new species, beauty, fear of what’s different and unknown, hatred.

The mutants have little in common with each other, other than the fact that they are all different. Yet, ironically, what connects them all (and us) is our humanity — that which is retained even after getting all the super-powers we can ever think of.

We are the human race and we can be or become as any one of these superheroes or supervillains. We get lonely, we struggle to fit in and find our place; we ask the same age-old questions. We are Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Professor X, Magneto and Sebastian Shaw. We are black, white, brown, yellow, red and blue (and all the other colors too).

We are Good and Evil.

We are all different and unique, yet human.

So, aren’t we all mutants?

***

Socrates’ verdict: 10 out of 10 (must watch)

Related articles
  • Transhumanism and the Technological Singularity
  • A Transhumanist Manifesto
  • Who are the Heroes of Transhumanism?
  • Transhumanism for Children
  • Enough Is Not Enough: The Integration of Transhumanism into Pop Culture
  • The Charlie Sheen Guide to Predicting Our Transhuman Future

Filed Under: Op Ed, Reviews Tagged With: posthuman, transhumanism

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Staying Sane in an Insane World
  • IASEAI’25 vs. The AI Action Summit: Will AI Be Driven by Cooperation or Competition?
  • “Conversations with the Future” Epilogue: Events Can Create the Future
  • Donald J. Robertson on How to Think Like Socrates in the Age of AI
  • Dr. Jad Tarifi of Integral AI: “We Now Have All the Ingredients for AGI”

Categories

  • Articles
  • Best Of
  • Featured
  • Featured Podcasts
  • Funny
  • News
  • Op Ed
  • Podcasts
  • Profiles
  • Reviews
  • ReWriting the Human Story
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • What if?

Join SingularityWeblog

Over 4,000 super smart people have subscribed to my newsletter in order to:

Discover the Trends

See the full spectrum of dangers and opportunities in a future of endless possibilities.

Discover the Tools

Locate the tools and resources you need to create a better future, a better business, and a better you.

Discover the People

Identify the major change agents creating the future. Hear their dreams and their fears.

Discover Yourself

Get inspired. Give birth to your best ideas. Create the future. Live long and prosper.

singularity-logo-2

Sign up for my weekly newsletter.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
You must accept the Terms and Conditions.
Get Started!

Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
  • Home
  • About
  • Start
  • Blog
  • Book
  • Podcast
  • Speaker
  • Media
  • Testimonials
  • Contact

Ethos: “Technology is the How, not the Why or What. So you can have the best possible How but if you mess up your Why or What you will do more damage than good. That is why technology is not enough.” Nikola Danaylov

Copyright © 2009-2025 Singularity Weblog. All Rights Reserved | Terms | Disclosure | Privacy Policy